Hope of Israel Ministries (Ecclesia of YEHOVAH):
Just What Do You Mean -- Anti-Semitism?
The Khazars themselves claimed descent from Japheth, and from their adoption of Judaism, they became known as Jews. But, they did not descend from Shem, and therefore they are NOT Semitic in origin!
by HOIM Staff
It is pointed out that the United Nations Conventions have the effect of changing race into any group having an ethnic belief, religion, common customs, national origins, etc, so that in this context multiracial Jews can now claim to be an ethnic group. “Anti-Semitic” now is made to refer to anything against the concept of this “Jewish” ethnic group. Anti-Semitism is in no way what it is presented to be. The word, "Anti-Semitism" was first printed as late as 1880, according to the 1901 Encyclopedia Judaica: Vol.1/641. It is a term that was created by Zionism, according to modern Jewish authority who state, "Jews began in the 19th century to call themselves Hebrews and Israelites in 1860. This coincides with the cry anti-Semitism" -- (Ency. Jud.1971, Vol.10:23).
The New Zealand Jewish Chronicle of Sept.1995 on page 15 quotes historian Robert Wistrich who says, "It dates back to 1879, the invention of a German journalist and writer who wanted to signify that anti-Semitism was not the same as traditional religious hatred of Jews, and therefore coined a phrase which had a racial connotation”.
The word, “anti-Semitism” was first printed as late as 1880 according to the 1901 Jewish Encyclopaedia (Vol. 1, p. 641). The word is used as a cover-up by those claiming to be Israelites or Shemites, “but who are not” -- (Revelation 2:9). These are who are known and identified as International Jewry today; they themselves state that they are Edom, as has been shown.
To be anti-Semitic rightly means being against the descendants of Shem, the son of Noah. Biblical Israel are Shemites. Historically and biblically, there are peoples known as "Jews" who are NOT Shemites, and some of these others descend from the other two sons of Noah, Japheth and Ham. They are not Israelites, but neither are some other Shemites.
Today we find a push for world government by these particular people, as usual through the socialist platform:
“Jews have been prominently identified with the modern Socialist movement from its very inception We also find evidenced the Communist ideal surfacing again in the United Nations Conventions. Very soon after the Communist revolution in Russia, the Jewish Chronicle of April 4: 1919 said: 'There is much in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism are at many points consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism'” (Jewish Encyclopaedia, Vol 11, p. 418).
The Encyclopedia Judaica (1971), Vol. 16, p. 1032 says:
“The modern term Zionism first appeared in the 19th Century...as the establishment of an organization”.
Communism sought to eliminate all opposition to its control and objectives and we find a similar operation emerging today against those who would contravene the U.N. Conventions. Communism, Zionism and United Nations have a dominating “Jewish” content. We will soon see more cries of anti-Semitism world-wide against those who oppose Edom in their war of extermination against Biblical Israel and Christianity.
There are Jews of many racial origins:
(1). THE ASHKENAZIM JEWS.
Some claim a link between Edom and the Khazars, but apart from that there is more than one identity calling themselves “Jews”; all of these have no claim to the name ‘Israel’. Regarding the Ashkenazim Jews who speak Yiddish, most dictionaries and encyclopaedia define Ashkenazim in words like “after ‘Ashkenaz’, the second son of Gomer”. This confirms Scripture concerning the sons of Noah, (Shem, Japheth and Ham), and their offspring:
“...the sons of Japheth, Gomer,....the sons of Gomer, Ashkenaz” (Genesis 10:1-3).
The Khazars themselves claimed descent from Japheth, and from their adoption of Judaism, they became known as Jews. But, they did not descend from Shem, and therefore they are NOT Semitic in origin. To relate the term “Anti-Semitism” to Jews of this origin is pure nonsense and part of the great deception! Eastern European Jews of this origin have NO Israelite connection. Anti-Semitism could not apply to them! These people are the majority in the State of Israel.
(2). THE SEPHARDIM JEWS.
The American People’s Encyclopaedia, (1925) indicates that these descended from Edomites who were cast out from Palestine by Prince Titus is AD 70. From thence they spread to North Africa and to Spain converting Berber Tribes and others to Judaism. There were Cardinals and Popes who were Sephardim Jews. They have no simple blood line, being Edomites diluted with Syrian, Canaanite, Phoenician and North African blood.
(3). THE SEPHARDIM / ASHKENAZIM JEWISH MIXTURE.
It is impossible to determine the degree of intermarriage between these two groups of non-Israelites, but there is evidence that this has been common.
(4). THE ETHIOPIAN DESCENDANTS OF HAM.
[The Falashas]. These are known as “Jews” because of acceptance of Judaism. The Encyclopaedia Judaica says:
“The history of the Falashas speaks of their Hamitic origin”.
(5). BABYLONIAN JEWS.
Those in the days of Mordecai and Esther, many who obviously were not of Judah took up Judaism --
“And many of the people of the land became Jews” (Ester 8:17).
(6). PROSELYTES TO JUDAISM.
These are people from other Semitic and non-Semitic origins, being known as Jews because of religious spirit and belief. To add to the confusion, we have the Arabs who come from the line of Shem through Abraham. To be anti-Arab is then to be anti-Semitic also.
Anyone who wants to call this mixture “Israel” is not speaking about the true Israel of YEHOVAH God as defined in the Bible. If we have another Israel we then have another gospel. The argument often raised is to infer that Arabs are not now Semitic and that racial admixture has rendered them so. But the same people will insist that Jews of such racial mixture are a single race when they are not. They want it both ways.
The territorial term “Ioudaios” is wrongly accepted as the racial term “Ioudas” when reading the New Testament is the root of the understanding problem. The use of the territorial term is not a measure of race, although some true Israelites were amongst the proselytes to Judaism in Judea.
Hope of Israel Ministries -- Courage for the Sake of Truth is Far Better Than Silence for the Sake of Unity!
|Scan with your